Brother scorned: Hate and Ethics between and through men
4:48 am in ethics, politics by admin
We live in societies that shape the beliefs each one of us hold dear and although everyone’s beliefs are different in nature we in fact share many
similarities to what others believe. This similarly of belief depends in large part due to our historically shared cultures. Of course, the spectrum of values within each culture is varied; right down to the individual but majorities in belief do occur and even between disparate societies themselves. In order for us to see why our American culture is the way it is and why we are having trouble in defining what we can as a society deem moral we have to look back in time.
If we go back to our founding fathers and then move forward in time, you will find our what we viewed as ethical shaped by ethical theories such, Utilitarianism, Deontology, Rawlian Social Justice, Divine law and Natural law theories. These ethical value clusters were pretty much grafted into our culture through English common law, puritan theology, Lockean individualism, populism, associationism, and by the French enlightenment. Like it or not, this is what we now have to work with. With all these ethical theory’s of what is right and wrong, you can see why we as a nation today are so divided. Later on ethical theories such as Hobbes social contract, and recently Feminism have been added to our American value system.
Our collective American values are what we see in our culture today. After studying these value systems outlined above it is my opinion that what we are seeing today is a direct split between such theories as Divine Law, Natural Theory and Hobbes social contract. These theories makes up a large part of our Americans value system. As for me, when I write such articles for my blog I maintain my personal objectiveness as best as possible. What I believe as morally right and true in this two part series is withheld to make objective points on the subject. Please bear with me on that one and understand if possible.
I believe Hobbes social contract makes up a large part of our American value system, in part because Lockean theory was quite common during the American colonial era and written in our constitution, embodied into it at the time. It is visible in the rights and laws we have today in America. Throughout our history, natural rights and institutional agendas as well as community social bonds have required the strength of contract law to balance our personal wants with our community needs. This can be seen since the founding of Mosaic law and before. It is these contract laws that are prevalent in America today that balance our personal wants with our community needs.
However, an overview of major Western European ethical theories is required to see the context of our American values. This overview of western European ethical theories is necessary because it is these Western European beliefs that form our current value systems and the values of our society, they may form a majority or many minority view points but they make us as Americans what we are and what might need to change. These European and American values are what we use to define what we consider right or wrong. According to James Rachels, “Morality is, at the very least, the effect to guide ones conduct by reason- that is the best reasons for doing.” When we are faced with a decision, were one option would benefit ourselves but hurt someone else and another option to help someone else but hurt ourselves which one would we pick? Would we rather promote the good of others rather than ones own good? Of course we would say I would help the other person but would you really? Hypothetically, what if you were on a life raft and you had a choice to save yourself or give up your seat to a drowning person, knowing that if you did you would then have to get out of the boat and drown instead, would you do it? Is this a Christian philosophy, utilitarian, a social justice philosophy? What if I were to say all three? Can there be a basis for minimum moral truths we can all agree on? Would this end the constant strife we have against what we view as competing values? I sure hope it would.
An example: Let me quote from the Bible Mathew 5: 40-42 “40. If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. 41. And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. 42. Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.” -NKJV
Now a definition of utilitarianism: It is the theory of personal values that decisions should be made such that the outcome should satisfy the most people, or give the most benefit, prompt the least pain and provide the most happiness to the most people possible.
Similar? Maybe? Can we agree that being kind to one another, promoting happiness without being amoral about it and helping one another is a good thing for society? If you were Christan, agnostic or an atheist could you agree on this? I would hope so and why should we all agree on this? So we can have our children grow up in a world without fear of a nuclear war, war in general, hate crimes, violence, poverty, hunger and disease.













Facebook
Twitter
FriendFeed
LinkedIn
Digg
Delicious
Newsvine
Mixx
Myspace
RSS
Recent Comments
(4 weeks ago)